"Summer Streets" May Give Major St. Louis Streets to Walkers, Cyclists But Fix Nothing for Daily Use
According to the St. Louis Beacon, St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay is considering closing major thoroughfares in St. Louis for a portion of some weekends to allow walkers, runners, cyclists and others to enjoy the roads. This is a great idea.
The Mayor clearly understands that people, not automobiles, really own the streets in our city and that closing streets to cars and giving them over to people to enjoy for recreational and social uses makes sense. If this is understood, why not take a step towards doing real, lasting, permanent work to make our streets safer and more inviting to people every day?
At the top of my list may be Forest Park. Many of the roads in the park are wide enough for five or more lanes. Why? At the very least there should be significant bulb-outs along roads in Forest Park to calm traffic. If the roads looks like you can drive 40mph motorists will drive 40mph. And of course, why not open many of the roads in our major parks to pedestrians and cyclists only? There's novelty in closing Lindell for four hours on a Saturday, but there's real utility in making a park more of a park.
Why not address the streets in our city that are particularly uninviting or even dangerous for pedestrians? Kingshighway, Gravois, Chippewa, Market and others have been completely given over to the car. Closing a short stretch of one of these for a few hours will make them no less dangerous when car traffic resumes.
The Urban Workshop has covered this issue on several levels, calling for St. Louis streets to be put on a diet, expressing disgust at streets designed to kill and advocating for pedestrian priority over simple traffic measures for the ongoing South Grand lane reduction test. So, "Summer Streets" is a good idea, but let's not be satisfied with neat, fun and novel, let's make our streets better for pedestrians all the time.
How is it that virtually all Americans came to think of themselves as "middle class" in the twentieth century? In this cultural history of real estate brokerage, Jeffrey M. Hornstein argues that the rise of the Realtors as dealers in both domestic space and the ideology of home ownership provides tremendous insight into this critical question.
To answer the question at the end of your second paragraph: Because the City is at least 20MUSD in the hole this year. Probably more next year. We're broke. Not to mention no political will. If we want to see the various proposals you and others suggest come to fruition, we will have to control City government. Mayor, aldermanic majorities, Comptroller, the State offices, etc. Think about Howard Dean's 50 state strategy for the Democratic Party. Even if there is no possible way a progressive could win the, oh, I don't know, 5th ward, you run somebody anyway, and so on, throughout the City. Oh, and establish a set of goals and guidelines so that people know what the ideas are, and to make sure no one pulls a Jeff Smith (idiot).
I agree that short closures of streets doesn't do much. All it would really do is annoy people if we are talking about major thoroughfares. You don't make Kingshighway pedestrian friendly by shutting it down. All that does is pushes cut-through traffic through the neighborhood, which would inevitably lead to accidents and hit pedestrians. I am 100% for slowing down traffic on all the major N-S streets (Kingshighway, Grand, Jefferson, Gravois, maybe Hampton) and at least Chouteau going E-W.
That being said, traffic still has to flow well. Most pedestrians drive cars and if you slow traffic too much there could be a backlash. Its a fine line.
I would love to see Forest Park car free. How can we make that happen? At least some of the time?
Here's the link to the Forest Park Forever contact page, http://www.forestparkforever.org/contact/. Perhaps we could start at the top with Lucie Springmeyer.